Ancient Geekery

WordPress vs WP Engine | Public Opinion Survey

This survey explores public opinion on the ongoing dispute between WordPress.org and WP Engine. The objective is to understand public awareness, perspectives, and concerns regarding the controversy. The survey is independent and does not endorse or condemn any party involved.

Focus: The survey addresses key points of contention, including Matt Mullenweg’s actions in taking control of the Advanced Custom Fields (ACF) plugin, WP Engine’s contributions to the WordPress community, and potential implications for the broader WordPress ecosystem.

Neutrality: The questions are designed to be impartial and objective, drawing upon information from various news articles, blog posts, and public statements.

Context: The sources provide context and insights into the events leading up to the dispute. You are strongly encouraged to review the sources before participating to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the situation.

Confidentiality: Individual responses will remain confidential. Aggregated findings might be shared publicly to highlight overall trends and insights.

This survey was created, and the questions were devised by Google’s NotebookLM AI.  We fed NotebookLM with 14 different input sources, including interviews with Matt Mullenweg himself, statements and social media posts from WP Engine and a variety of online articles and transcripts of YouTube videos on the subject.

Opinion survey v1

Section 1 - Background & Awareness

Not at all concerned Extremely concerned
Totally unfamiliar Fully familiar
Totally unfamiliar Fully familiar
Totally unfamiliar Fully familiar

Section 2 - Opinions & Perspectives

Totally disagree Agree 100%
Totally disagree Agree 100%
Not at all concerned Extremely concerned
Unsure/no opinion Yes, significantly

Section 3 - WordPress, ACF, SCF usage and the future

Not at all Likely Extremely Likely

Section 4 - And finally ...

Section 5 - Validation